I’d zoned out a few times during the day, watching a pheasant wandering the grounds and the magpies ganging up on rabbits, rather than make notes. It wasn’t until later in the evening, long after the Governess has joined us to discuss other possible work, that I started to feel like I wanted to be out of there and back home in bed.
Alternatively, the unexpected downswing might have come about from learning that not only had FOX renewed the lacklustre Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles but Sky One is looking to remake Blake’s 7. Why and why? And... for the love of all that’s holy, WHY?
While Elaine Pyke, Sky One’s commissioning editor, seems to misguidedly think that Blake’s 7, like the new Battlestar Galactica, represents “the best traditions of the genre”, I’d say that Blake’s 7 actually represents everything wrong with useless, ill thought out science fiction.
Blake’s 7, it’s reasonably fair to say, falls somewhere between a bit rubbish and dreadful rubbish. It was bright and colourful and entertaining for a younger audience, but then so where the clowns at the circus.
Supposed to be a futuristic variation of Robin Hood – a live-action Rocket Robin Hood if you will – it was a litany of useless clichés. A grim future where individual freedom of expression is outlawed? A handful of rebels in one spaceship battling a totalitarian Federation that rules over the galaxy?
It only really got interesting when Blake and crew argued amongst themselves. A few episodes hit reasonably close to the mark, but otherwise it was like watching mosquitoes trying to take down an elephant, badly. The only reason they survived as long as they did was because Federation soldiers were even worse shots than the Death Star stormtroopers.
Perhaps the most interesting thing about Blake’s 7 was how, some time ago, fans pestered and petitioned the BBC to repeat it. When the Corporation finally relented and rebroadcast the damn show, the ratings held for the first couple of episodes and then plummeted. The years certainly hadn’t been kind to what had been just about acceptable in the late 1970s.
Of course the news wasn’t that Sky was going ahead with the series, simply that they had ordered two scripts for a potential series. How long has it been since their remake of The Prisoner was supposed to appear? I wonder how that is coming along.
Because, if you want to get information out of somebody you take them down into a basement room, soak them in water, attach electrodes and run a current through them. If that doesn’t work you start in on them with a chisel and a blowtorch. It certainly doesn’t need some stupid Village and stupidly overcomplicated scenarios to elicit the facts from someone.
So what do you think is the way to go with Blake’s 7? How does a handful of rebels fight a dictatorial regime? When he first saw an episode of Joss Whedon’s Firefly, Work Buddy rather astutely pointed out that was the Blake’s 7 remake, right there, or rather the way that it should go.
But I suppose instead of doing what Whedon did with Firefly or what Ron Moore is currently doing with Battlestar Galactica, they’ll go for big, silly names and unbelievably stupid scenarios that haven’t even a shred of logic to them. But then that was what Blake’s 7’s creator, the late Terry Nation, certainly excelled at.
0 Yorumlar